Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs TRAZX
FFRHX vs TRAZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. TRAZX (4.74B). TRAZX (8.38) and FFRHX (7.97) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than TRAZX: FFRHX (23 years) vs TRAZX (5 years). FFRHX (0.73) is less costly to investors than TRAZX (0.57). TRAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX (0) and TRAZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. FFRHX (6.37). TRAZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.59 vs. FFRHX (39.30).
| FFRHX | TRAZX | FFRHX / TRAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.02 | 3,650% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.57 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.414 | 2.550 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 4.74B | 312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.97 | 8.38 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 7.94 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 29.50 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.30 | 41.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement