Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs TRAZX
FFRHX vs TRAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. TRAZX (4.83B). TRAZX pays higher dividends than FFRHX: TRAZX (8.29) vs FFRHX (7.87). FFRHX was incepted earlier than TRAZX: FFRHX (23 years) vs TRAZX (5 years). FFRHX (0.73) is less costly to investors than TRAZX (0.57). TRAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX (0) and TRAZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.55 vs. FFRHX (7.23). TRAZX return over 5 years is better than : 44.08 vs. FFRHX (41.90).
| FFRHX | TRAZX | FFRHX / TRAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.02 | 3,650% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.57 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.478 | 3.529 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 4.83B | 313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.87 | 8.29 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 8.55 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.31 | 34.60 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.90 | 44.08 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement