Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRIX vs MXFAX
FFRIX vs MXFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRIX vs. MXFAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRIX is a Hold and MXFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. MXFAX (1.55B). FFRIX pays higher dividends than MXFAX: FFRIX (7.94) vs MXFAX (7.48). FFRIX was incepted earlier than MXFAX: FFRIX (25 years) vs MXFAX (21 years). MXFAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. MXFAX (26.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MXFAX: FFRIX (0) vs MXFAX (15000). MXFAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRIX: MXFAX (25000) vs FFRIX (500). FFRIX (6.33) and MXFAX (6.27) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.04 vs. MXFAX (33.16).
| FFRIX | MXFAX | FFRIX / MXFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.96 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.96 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.283 | 1.667 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 25000 | 2% |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 1.55B | 957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.94 | 7.48 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 6.27 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.39 | 26.48 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.04 | 33.16 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.96 | 51.04 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement