Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRIX vs NFRFX
FFRIX vs NFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRIX vs. NFRFX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRIX is a Hold and NFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. NFRFX (1.6B). NFRFX pays higher dividends than FFRIX: NFRFX (8.14) vs FFRIX (7.74). FFRIX was incepted earlier than NFRFX: FFRIX (25 years) vs NFRFX (11 years). FFRIX (0.77) is less costly to investors than NFRFX (0.67). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NFRFX (24.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: FFRIX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). NFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.83 vs. FFRIX (6.96). NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.52 vs. FFRIX (39.24).
| FFRIX | NFRFX | FFRIX / NFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.67 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.67 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.631 | 3.616 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 1.6B | 950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.74 | 8.14 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 7.83 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.26 | 27.58 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.24 | 42.52 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.06 | 62.58 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement