Ad is loading...
FFRIX vs RFRAX
FFRIX vs RFRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRIX vs. RFRAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRIX is a Hold and RFRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. RFRAX (728M). FFRIX (8.09) and RFRAX (7.75) have matching dividends . FFRIX was incepted earlier than RFRAX: FFRIX (25 years) vs RFRAX (19 years). RFRAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). RFRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRIX (41.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRAX: FFRIX (0) vs RFRAX (2000). RFRAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRIX: RFRAX (5000) vs FFRIX (500). RFRAX (5.47) and FFRIX (5.43) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.29 vs. RFRAX (39.60).
| FFRIX | RFRAX | FFRIX / RFRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.01 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.03 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.841 | -0.347 | 242% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 5000 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 16B | 728M | 2,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.09 | 7.75 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | 5.47 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.91 | 17.90 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.29 | 39.60 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.33 | 46.94 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...