Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRIX vs RSFLX
FFRIX vs RSFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRIX vs. RSFLX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRIX is a Hold and RSFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. RSFLX (401M). RSFLX pays higher dividends than FFRIX: RSFLX (9.66) vs FFRIX (7.94). FFRIX was incepted earlier than RSFLX: FFRIX (25 years) vs RSFLX (15 years). RSFLX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). RSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FFRIX (41.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSFLX: FFRIX (0) vs RSFLX (2500). RSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. FFRIX (6.67). FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.51 vs. RSFLX (28.08).
| FFRIX | RSFLX | FFRIX / RSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.12 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.394 | 1.805 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 401M | 3,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.94 | 9.66 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 7.42 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.82 | 20.88 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.51 | 28.08 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.30 | 48.44 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers