Ad is loading...
FFRTX vs RFRAX
FFRTX vs RFRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRTX vs. RFRAX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRTX is a Buy and RFRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRTX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. RFRAX (736M). FFRTX (7.83) and RFRAX (7.66) have matching dividends . FFRTX was incepted earlier than RFRAX: FFRTX (25 years) vs RFRAX (19 years). RFRAX (1.03) and FFRTX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . RFRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRTX (41.00). RFRAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFRTX (3%) vs FFRTX (3%). FFRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRAX: FFRTX (0) vs RFRAX (2000). RFRAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRTX: RFRAX (5000) vs FFRTX (500). RFRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. FFRTX (5.18). FFRTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.11 vs. RFRAX (40.16).
| FFRTX | RFRAX | FFRTX / RFRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.01 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.03 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.320 | 0.467 | -69% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 92% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 5000 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 736M | 1,957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.83 | 7.66 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.18 | 5.49 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.06 | 19.26 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.11 | 40.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.74 | 47.69 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers