Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRTX vs RFRCX
FFRTX vs RFRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRTX vs. RFRCX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRTX is a Buy and RFRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRTX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. RFRCX (745M). FFRTX pays higher dividends than RFRCX: FFRTX (7.83) vs RFRCX (6.90). FFRTX was incepted earlier than RFRCX: FFRTX (25 years) vs RFRCX (19 years). RFRCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FFRTX (1.02). RFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRTX (41.00). FFRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRCX: FFRTX (0) vs RFRCX (2000). RFRCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRTX: RFRCX (5000) vs FFRTX (500). FFRTX (5.89) and RFRCX (5.74) have marching annual gain over last year. FFRTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.02 vs. RFRCX (33.80).
| FFRTX | RFRCX | FFRTX / RFRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.76 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.78 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.561 | 1.252 | 45% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 5000 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 745M | 1,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.83 | 6.90 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 5.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.35 | 21.16 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.02 | 33.80 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.23 | 38.58 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement