Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSFX vs RFVTX
FFSFX vs RFVTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSFX vs. RFVTX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSFX is a Hold and RFVTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFVTX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. FFSFX (2.22B). RFVTX pays higher dividends than FFSFX: RFVTX (1.00) vs FFSFX (0.92). FFSFX was incepted earlier than RFVTX: FFSFX (6 years) vs RFVTX (5 years). FFSFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RFVTX (0.39). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RFVTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFVTX: FFSFX (0) vs RFVTX (250). RFVTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.11 vs. FFSFX (13.11). RFVTX return over 5 years is better than : 59.66 vs. FFSFX (47.39).
| FFSFX | RFVTX | FFSFX / RFVTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.39 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.39 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.189 | 10.292 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 5.12B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.00 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 14.11 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.94 | 43.04 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.39 | 59.66 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement