Ad is loading...
FFSFX vs RHLTX
FFSFX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSFX vs. RHLTX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSFX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FFSFX (1.86B). FFSFX (1.03) and RHLTX (1.02) have matching dividends . FFSFX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFSFX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). FFSFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RHLTX (0.53). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFSFX (0) vs RHLTX (250). FFSFX (8.60) and RHLTX (8.32) have marching annual gain over last year. RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 64.08 vs. FFSFX (55.78).
| FFSFX | RHLTX | FFSFX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.53 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.53 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.679 | -1.032 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 4.23B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.02 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.60 | 8.32 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | 24.97 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.78 | 64.08 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...