Ad is loading...
FFSZX vs RHLTX
FFSZX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSZX vs. RHLTX commentary
Feb 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSZX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.22B vs. FFSZX (1.85B). FFSZX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: FFSZX (1.38) vs RHLTX (1.12). FFSZX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFSZX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). FFSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. RHLTX (1.00). FFSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFSZX (0) vs RHLTX (250). FFSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.83 vs. RHLTX (12.19).
| FFSZX | RHLTX | FFSZX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.226 | 3.266 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 4.22B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.12 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.83 | 12.19 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.66 | 22.39 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.45 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |