Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSZX vs RHLTX
FFSZX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSZX vs. RHLTX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSZX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FFSZX (2.06B). FFSZX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: FFSZX (1.56) vs RHLTX (0.96). FFSZX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFSZX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). RHLTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFSZX (0.46). FFSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FFSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFSZX (0) vs RHLTX (250). RHLTX (10.48) and FFSZX (10.11) have marching annual gain over last year. RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 63.82 vs. FFSZX (54.27).
| FFSZX | RHLTX | FFSZX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.943 | 6.648 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 4.43B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.96 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 10.48 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.18 | 46.96 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.27 | 63.82 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement