Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSZX vs RHLTX
FFSZX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSZX vs. RHLTX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSZX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FFSZX (1.92B). FFSZX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: FFSZX (1.63) vs RHLTX (1.01). FFSZX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFSZX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). RHLTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFSZX (0.46). FFSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FFSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFSZX (0) vs RHLTX (250). RHLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. FFSZX (7.54). RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 64.36 vs. FFSZX (56.35).
| FFSZX | RHLTX | FFSZX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.245 | 3.381 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 4.43B | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.01 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 8.76 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.16 | 35.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.35 | 64.36 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |