Ad is loading...
FFSZX vs RHLTX
FFSZX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSZX vs. RHLTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSZX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FFSZX (1.86B). FFSZX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: FFSZX (1.65) vs RHLTX (1.02). FFSZX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FFSZX (6 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). RHLTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FFSZX (0.46). FFSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). FFSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHLTX: FFSZX (0) vs RHLTX (250). FFSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. RHLTX (6.48). RHLTX return over 5 years is better than : 60.20 vs. FFSZX (53.35).
| FFSZX | RHLTX | FFSZX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.302 | -1.261 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 4.23B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.02 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 6.48 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.58 | 24.68 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.35 | 60.20 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |