Compare trend and price FFTY vs LSCC
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTY is a Hold and LSCC is a Hold.
LSCC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FFTY | LSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GCGCX | 7.77 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Concentrated Growth C | |||
| BPIRX | 14.02 | -0.15 | -1.06% |
| Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl | |||
| PAXLX | 13.85 | -0.20 | -1.42% |
| Impax Large Cap Fund Individual Investor | |||
| RYDKX | 84.64 | -1.29 | -1.50% |
| Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® C | |||
| HAGCX | 52.22 | -1.04 | -1.95% |
| Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth C | |||
FFTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFTY has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFTY jumps, then ON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFTY | 100% | -2.54% | ||
| ON - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| CZR - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | -4.66% | ||
| ACLS - FFTY | 67% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| LSCC - FFTY | 66% Closely correlated | -10.75% | ||
| ITT - FFTY | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
LSCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with SMTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then SMTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSCC | 100% | -10.75% | ||
| SMTC - LSCC | 70% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| MCHP - LSCC | 70% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| NXPI - LSCC | 69% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| ON - LSCC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| TER - LSCC | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
More | ||||