FFWM
Price
$5.26
Change
+$0.16 (+3.14%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
407.13M
53 days until earnings call
MBINN
Price
$20.00
Change
+$0.26 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jun 6, 03:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs MBINN

Header iconFFWM vs MBINN Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs MBINNBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$5.26
Change+$0.16 (+3.14%)
Volume$500
Capitalization407.13M
Merchants Ban
Price$20.00
Change+$0.26 (+1.32%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FFWM vs MBINN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. MBINN commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a StrongBuy and MBINN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $5.10 vs. MBINN: $19.74)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and MBINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 76% vs. MBINN: 49%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $407.13M vs. MBINN: $0
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $407.13M. MBINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBINN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the long-term than MBINN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBINN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than MBINN.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.04% price change this week, while MBINN (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBINN YTD gains are higher at: 0.081 vs. FFWM (-17.874). MBINN has less debt than FFWM: MBINN (964M) vs FFWM (1.58B). MBINN has higher revenues than FFWM: MBINN (559M) vs FFWM (175M).
FFWMMBINNFFWM / MBINN
Capitalization407MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.8740.081-22,052%
P/E Ratio3.63N/A-
Revenue175M559M31%
Total CashN/A10.6M-
Total Debt1.58B964M164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMMBINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCCUX10.97N/A
N/A
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund C
CLSPX28.97N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I
JNGIX72.27N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Growth And Income D
VVMCX16.18N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Mid Cap Value
WSMVX24.58N/A
N/A
Wilshire Small Company Value Instl

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
N/A
TCBK - FFWM
68%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
HOPE - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
DCOM - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
SFBS - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
CAC - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
More

MBINN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINN has been loosely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINN jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINN
1D Price
Change %
MBINN100%
-0.20%
FITBO - MBINN
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
HAFC - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
MSBI - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
FCNCO - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
FFWM - MBINN
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More