Ad is loading...
FFWM
Price
$7.71
Change
-$0.09 (-1.15%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
78 days until earnings call
QCCO
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

FFWM vs QCCO

Header iconFFWM vs QCCO Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs QCCOBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$7.71
Change-$0.09 (-1.15%)
Volume$334.37K
CapitalizationN/A
QC Holdings
Price$0.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FFWM vs QCCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. QCCO commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a Sell and QCCO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FFWM: $7.71 vs. QCCO: $0.50)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and QCCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 57% vs. QCCO: 3%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $407.13M vs. QCCO: $7.66M
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $407.13M. QCCO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQCCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QCCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFWM and QCCO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while QCCO (@Regional Banks) price change was +51.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFWM($407M) has a higher market cap than QCCO($7.66M). FFWM YTD gains are higher at: -20.117 vs. QCCO (-27.007). QCCO has less debt than FFWM: QCCO (6.52M) vs FFWM (1.58B). FFWM has higher revenues than QCCO: FFWM (175M) vs QCCO (140M).
FFWMQCCOFFWM / QCCO
Capitalization407M7.66M5,313%
EBITDAN/A4.07M-
Gain YTD-20.117-27.00774%
P/E Ratio3.63N/A-
Revenue175M140M125%
Total CashN/A12.8M-
Total Debt1.58B6.52M24,271%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs QCCO: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
QCCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
25100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCCO's Valuation (2) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFWM (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that QCCO’s stock grew significantly faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

QCCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FFWM (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that QCCO’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for QCCO (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FFWM’s stock grew significantly faster than QCCO’s over the last 12 months.

QCCO's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FFWM (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that QCCO’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as QCCO (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to QCCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGEZX12.39-0.04
-0.32%
Destinations Equity Income Z
PMVFX25.79-0.18
-0.69%
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R4
FASGX28.65-0.26
-0.90%
Fidelity Asset Manager 70%
JSCHX34.61-0.50
-1.42%
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend R6
RHJSX25.06-0.51
-1.99%
Rice Hall James Micro Cap Instl

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
-1.15%
SFNC - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
HBNC - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
CNOB - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
VLY - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
SFBS - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
More

QCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCCO has been loosely correlated with KEFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QCCO jumps, then KEFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCCO
1D Price
Change %
QCCO100%
N/A
KEFI - QCCO
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EFIN - QCCO
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQCF - QCCO
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
FFWM - QCCO
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
DNKEY - QCCO
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More