Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFWTX vs RBATX
FFWTX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFWTX vs. RBATX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWTX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.9B vs. FFWTX (733M). FFWTX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FFWTX (3.07) vs RBATX (2.05). FFWTX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FFWTX (10 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FFWTX (0.08). FFWTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). RBATX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFWTX: RBATX (250) vs FFWTX (5000000). RBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.90 vs. FFWTX (4.32). RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 16.34 vs. FFWTX (10.76).
| FFWTX | RBATX | FFWTX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.38 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.38 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.313 | 6.632 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 733M | 3.9B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 2.05 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 5.90 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.46 | 17.60 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.76 | 16.34 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.57 | 29.04 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement