Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs MIDSX
FGADX vs MIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs MIDSX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$33.86
Change+$0.54 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FGADX vs MIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. MIDSX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Hold and MIDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. MIDSX (24.1M). FGADX pays higher dividends than MIDSX: FGADX (7.88) vs MIDSX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than MIDSX: FGADX (29 years) vs MIDSX (40 years). MIDSX (5.98) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.50 vs. MIDSX (5.00). MIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: MIDSX (1000) vs FGADX (100000). MIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 86.67 vs. FGADX (71.64). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 60.19 vs. MIDSX (25.14).
| FGADX | MIDSX | FGADX / MIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 5.98 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 5.98 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 75.924 | 89.831 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 24.1M | 6,763% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.88 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.64 | 86.67 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 111.53 | 113.33 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.19 | 25.14 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 290.33 | 169.88 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement