Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs MIDSX
FGADX vs MIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs MIDSX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$33.23
Change+$0.34 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
FGADX vs MIDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. MIDSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a StrongBuy and MIDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MIDSX (26.3M). FGADX pays higher dividends than MIDSX: FGADX (7.69) vs MIDSX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than MIDSX: FGADX (28 years) vs MIDSX (39 years). MIDSX (5.98) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.50 vs. MIDSX (5.00). MIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: MIDSX (1000) vs FGADX (100000). MIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 94.59 vs. FGADX (84.18). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 105.43 vs. MIDSX (51.05).
| FGADX | MIDSX | FGADX / MIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 5.98 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 5.98 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 73.654 | 83.051 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 26.3M | 6,072% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 84.18 | 94.59 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.06 | 89.47 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.43 | 51.05 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 230.65 | 122.68 | 188% |