Ad is loading...
FGADX vs RYMPX
FGADX vs RYMPX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYMPX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$29.92
Change+$0.64 (+2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
Rydex Precious Metals H
Price$139.85
Change+$4.51 (+3.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104M
FGADX vs RYMPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYMPX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and RYMPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.47B vs. RYMPX (104M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYMPX: FGADX (8.28) vs RYMPX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYMPX: FGADX (28 years) vs RYMPX (22 years). RYMPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). RYMPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 387.00 vs. FGADX (14.50). RYMPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: RYMPX (2500) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.85 vs. RYMPX (33.65). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 91.86 vs. RYMPX (33.66).
| FGADX | RYMPX | FGADX / RYMPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.55 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.58 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 57.973 | 39.571 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 104M | 1,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.85 | 33.65 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.32 | 39.82 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.86 | 33.66 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 180.01 | 97.64 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...