Ad is loading...
FGADX vs RYMPX
FGADX vs RYMPX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYMPX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$29.78
Change-$0.37 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
Rydex Precious Metals H
Price$139.83
Change-$2.78 (-1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.01M
FGADX vs RYMPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYMPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and RYMPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. RYMPX (85M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYMPX: FGADX (8.85) vs RYMPX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYMPX: FGADX (28 years) vs RYMPX (22 years). RYMPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). RYMPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 387.00 vs. FGADX (14.50). RYMPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: RYMPX (2500) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.19 vs. RYMPX (43.14). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 124.94 vs. RYMPX (60.41).
| FGADX | RYMPX | FGADX / RYMPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.55 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.58 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 59.187 | 42.325 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 85M | 1,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.85 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 70.19 | 43.14 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.63 | 7.68 | 373% |
| Returns for 5 years | 124.94 | 60.41 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 197.78 | 106.71 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers