Ad is loading...
FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYZCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$26.73
Change+$1.19 (+4.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
Rydex Precious Metals C
Price$104.41
Change+$3.71 (+3.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.48M
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYZCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and RYZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYZCX (73.5M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FGADX (8.85) vs RYZCX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FGADX (28 years) vs RYZCX (24 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 387.00 vs. FGADX (14.50). RYZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: RYZCX (2500) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.81 vs. RYZCX (22.64). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 102.32 vs. RYZCX (38.46).
| FGADX | RYZCX | FGADX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.30 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.33 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.847 | 24.321 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 73.5M | 1,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.85 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.81 | 22.64 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.44 | -6.58 | -189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.32 | 38.46 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.69 | 68.41 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...