Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYZCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$33.23
Change+$0.34 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Rydex Precious Metals C
Price$123.37
Change+$1.64 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets115.03M
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYZCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a StrongBuy and RYZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. RYZCX (115M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FGADX (7.69) vs RYZCX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FGADX (28 years) vs RYZCX (24 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 387.00 vs. FGADX (14.50). RYZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: RYZCX (2500) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 84.18 vs. RYZCX (52.20). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 105.43 vs. RYZCX (43.00).
| FGADX | RYZCX | FGADX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.30 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.33 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 73.654 | 50.284 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 115M | 1,389% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 84.18 | 52.20 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.06 | 54.03 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.43 | 43.00 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 230.65 | 112.18 | 206% |