Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYZCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$30.48
Change+$0.83 (+2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
Rydex Precious Metals C
Price$112.77
Change+$2.51 (+2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.81M
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYZCX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Hold and RYZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. RYZCX (105M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FGADX (8.28) vs RYZCX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FGADX (28 years) vs RYZCX (24 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 387.00 vs. FGADX (14.50). RYZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: RYZCX (2500) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 65.10 vs. RYZCX (32.45). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 84.20 vs. RYZCX (22.94).
| FGADX | RYZCX | FGADX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.30 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.33 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.929 | 39.222 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 105M | 1,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 65.10 | 32.45 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.83 | 29.98 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.20 | 22.94 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.65 | 88.77 | 220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement