Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs UNWPX
FGADX vs UNWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs UNWPX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$31.94
Change+$0.10 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
US Global Investors World Prec Mnral
Price$2.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.31M
FGADX vs UNWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. UNWPX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a StrongBuy and UNWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. UNWPX (49.3M). FGADX pays higher dividends than UNWPX: FGADX (7.69) vs UNWPX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than UNWPX: FGADX (28 years) vs UNWPX (40 years). UNWPX (2.18) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). UNWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGADX (14.50). UNWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: UNWPX (5000) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 77.24 vs. UNWPX (36.60). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 98.87 vs. UNWPX (12.70).
| FGADX | UNWPX | FGADX / UNWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.18 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 68.110 | 41.216 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 5000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 49.3M | 3,140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 77.24 | 36.60 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.34 | -3.69 | -1,881% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.87 | 12.70 | 779% |
| Returns for 10 years | 215.70 | 44.48 | 485% |