Ad is loading...
FGADX vs UNWPX
FGADX vs UNWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs UNWPX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$29.92
Change+$0.64 (+2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
US Global Investors World Prec Mnral
Price$1.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.21M
FGADX vs UNWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. UNWPX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and UNWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.43B vs. UNWPX (46.2M). FGADX pays higher dividends than UNWPX: FGADX (8.28) vs UNWPX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than UNWPX: FGADX (28 years) vs UNWPX (39 years). UNWPX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). UNWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGADX (14.50). UNWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: UNWPX (5000) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.36 vs. UNWPX (21.15). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 87.75 vs. UNWPX (13.60).
| FGADX | UNWPX | FGADX / UNWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.47 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.74 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 54.593 | 27.703 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 5000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 46.2M | 3,104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.36 | 21.15 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.81 | -5.03 | -1,210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.75 | 13.60 | 645% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.02 | 24.79 | 702% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...