Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs UPMMX
FGADX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs UPMMX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$29.64
Change+$0.87 (+3.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A
Price$27.83
Change+$0.65 (+2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets701.58M
FGADX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. UPMMX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and UPMMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. UPMMX (702M). FGADX pays higher dividends than UPMMX: FGADX (8.28) vs UPMMX (0.00). FGADX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FGADX (28 years) vs UPMMX (15 years). UPMMX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.50 vs. UPMMX (1.00). UPMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGADX: UPMMX (2500) vs FGADX (100000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.66 vs. UPMMX (39.10). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 73.87 vs. UPMMX (42.85).
| FGADX | UPMMX | FGADX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.34 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.41 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 51.901 | 46.444 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 702M | 200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.66 | 39.10 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.52 | 55.43 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.87 | 42.85 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.61 | 133.64 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement