FGF
Price
$17.15
Change
+$0.74 (+4.51%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
40M
FIHL
Price
$16.19
Change
-$0.06 (-0.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.26B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGF vs FIHL

Header iconFGF vs FIHL Comparison
Open Charts FGF vs FIHLBanner chart's image
Fundamental Global
Price$17.15
Change+$0.74 (+4.51%)
Volume$403
Capitalization40M
Fidelis Insurance Holdings
Price$16.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.37%)
Volume$344.31K
Capitalization2.26B
FGF vs FIHL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGF vs. FIHL commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGF is a Hold and FIHL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FGF: $17.15 vs. FIHL: $16.19)
Brand notoriety: FGF and FIHL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGF: 10% vs. FIHL: 53%
Market capitalization -- FGF: $40M vs. FIHL: $2.26B
FGF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $40M. FIHL’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFIHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FIHL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FIHL is a better buy in the long-term than FGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIHL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FIHL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGF is a better buy in the short-term than FIHL.

Price Growth

FGF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while FIHL (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FGF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

FIHL is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.02% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIHL($2.26B) has a higher market cap than FGF($40M). FGF has higher P/E ratio than FIHL: FGF (6.71) vs FIHL (1.03). FIHL YTD gains are higher at: -9.526 vs. FGF (-21.331). FIHL has more cash in the bank: 4.01B vs. FGF (2.4M). FGF has less debt than FIHL: FGF (387K) vs FIHL (448M). FIHL has higher revenues than FGF: FIHL (3.59B) vs FGF (23.7M).
FGFFIHLFGF / FIHL
Capitalization40M2.26B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.331-9.526224%
P/E Ratio6.711.03651%
Revenue23.7M3.59B1%
Total Cash2.4M4.01B0%
Total Debt387K448M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGF: Fundamental Ratings
FGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGFFIHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLS55.291.30
+2.41%
Flowserve Corp
LNN148.291.18
+0.80%
Lindsay Corp
REFI14.250.02
+0.14%
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance
UPS104.13-1.41
-1.34%
United Parcel Service
NSYS8.79-0.70
-7.38%
Nortech Systems

FGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGF and FIHL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGF and FIHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGF
1D Price
Change %
FGF100%
+4.51%
FIHL - FGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
ALIZY - FGF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
ESGR - FGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGLO - FGF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
SLF - FGF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More

FIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIHL has been loosely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIHL jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIHL
1D Price
Change %
FIHL100%
-0.37%
ORI - FIHL
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
ACGL - FIHL
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
AIG - FIHL
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
SLF - FIHL
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
AEG - FIHL
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More