Ad is loading...
FGIAX vs TOLSX
FGIAX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FGIAX vs TOLSX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure A
Price$11.59
Change+$0.41 (+3.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets403.56M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$15.50
Change+$0.45 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets804.14M
FGIAX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIAX vs. TOLSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIAX is a Buy and TOLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 804M vs. FGIAX (404M). TOLSX (2.17) and FGIAX (2.10) have matching dividends . FGIAX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FGIAX (17 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). FGIAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than TOLSX (1.21). FGIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. TOLSX (43.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGIAX: TOLSX (2500) vs FGIAX (3000). FGIAX (4.49) and TOLSX (4.41) have marching annual gain over last year. FGIAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.44 vs. TOLSX (11.41).
| FGIAX | TOLSX | FGIAX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.11 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.21 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.887 | -0.290 | 306% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 404M | 804M | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 2.17 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.49 | 4.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.32 | -14.89 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.44 | 11.41 | 267% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.23 | 19.51 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...