FGLDF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.89M
FNLPF
Price
$8.16
Change
-$0.15 (-1.81%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.86B
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FGLDF vs FNLPF

Header iconFGLDF vs FNLPF Comparison
Open Charts FGLDF vs FNLPFBanner chart's image
Falcon Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization4.89M
Fresnillo
Price$8.16
Change-$0.15 (-1.81%)
Volume$5.33K
Capitalization5.86B
FGLDF vs FNLPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGLDF vs. FNLPF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGLDF is a Hold and FNLPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FGLDF: $0.02 vs. FNLPF: $8.16)
Brand notoriety: FGLDF and FNLPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGLDF: 23% vs. FNLPF: 55%
Market capitalization -- FGLDF: $4.89M vs. FNLPF: $5.86B
FGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.89M. FNLPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNLPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNLPF is a better buy in the long-term than FGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGLDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNLPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FNLPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than FNLPF.

Price Growth

FGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +19.83% price change this week, while FNLPF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNLPF is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNLPF($5.86B) has a higher market cap than FGLDF($4.89M). FNLPF YTD gains are higher at: 3.949 vs. FGLDF (-0.505). FNLPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 829M vs. FGLDF (-897.89K). FNLPF has more cash in the bank: 2.56M vs. FGLDF (859K). FGLDF has less debt than FNLPF: FGLDF (99K) vs FNLPF (1.27B). FNLPF has higher revenues than FGLDF: FNLPF (2.43B) vs FGLDF (0).
FGLDFFNLPFFGLDF / FNLPF
Capitalization4.89M5.86B0%
EBITDA-897.89K829M-0%
Gain YTD-0.5053.949-13%
P/E RatioN/A25.19-
Revenue02.43B-
Total Cash859K2.56M34%
Total Debt99K1.27B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLPF: Fundamental Ratings
FNLPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGLDFFNLPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACAYX47.850.59
+1.25%
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl Y
DCSCX60.790.54
+0.90%
Davis Balanced Fund C
FFBFX26.990.23
+0.86%
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd Inv
PRWAX75.360.52
+0.69%
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities Fund
EATVX41.600.20
+0.48%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Value A

FGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGLDF and SVGAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGLDF and SVGAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGLDF
1D Price
Change %
FGLDF100%
+12.57%
SVGAF - FGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+253.33%
FNLPF - FGLDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
FFOXF - FGLDF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
FTBYF - FGLDF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMGF - FGLDF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

FNLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLPF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNLPF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLPF
1D Price
Change %
FNLPF100%
-1.81%
PAAS - FNLPF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
HL - FNLPF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
AU - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
MAG - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
SILV - FNLPF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More