Ad is loading...
FGNCX vs TOLSX
FGNCX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs TOLSX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$11.48
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets450.25M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$15.54
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets834M
FGNCX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. TOLSX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Buy and TOLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 834M vs. FGNCX (450M). TOLSX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: TOLSX (2.41) vs FGNCX (1.52). FGNCX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FGNCX (16 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. TOLSX (43.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: TOLSX (2500) vs FGNCX (3000). FGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. TOLSX (10.26). FGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.47 vs. TOLSX (8.97).
| FGNCX | TOLSX | FGNCX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.884 | 2.842 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 450M | 834M | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 2.41 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 10.26 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.77 | -3.87 | -227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.47 | 8.97 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.53 | 23.18 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...