Ad is loading...
FGNCX vs TOLSX
FGNCX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs TOLSX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$11.46
Change+$0.17 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets469.89M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$15.17
Change+$0.17 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets798.43M
FGNCX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. TOLSX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Buy and TOLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 798M vs. FGNCX (470M). TOLSX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: TOLSX (2.41) vs FGNCX (1.52). FGNCX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FGNCX (16 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. TOLSX (43.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: TOLSX (2500) vs FGNCX (3000). FGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.40 vs. TOLSX (7.26). FGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.01 vs. TOLSX (-2.39).
| FGNCX | TOLSX | FGNCX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.523 | -0.859 | -410% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 798M | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 2.41 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.40 | 7.26 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.32 | -7.76 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.01 | -2.39 | -210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.93 | 17.56 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...