Ad is loading...
FGNCX vs TOLSX
FGNCX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs TOLSX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$11.92
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.24M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.48
Change+$0.10 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.45M
FGNCX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. TOLSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Buy and TOLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. FGNCX (439M). TOLSX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: TOLSX (2.17) vs FGNCX (1.42). FGNCX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FGNCX (16 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). FGNCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than TOLSX (1.21). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. TOLSX (43.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: TOLSX (2500) vs FGNCX (3000). TOLSX (13.40) and FGNCX (12.93) have marching annual gain over last year. FGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.10 vs. TOLSX (37.74).
| FGNCX | TOLSX | FGNCX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.11 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.21 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.859 | 8.521 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 876M | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 2.17 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.93 | 13.40 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.65 | -5.92 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.10 | 37.74 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.80 | 29.89 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers