Ad is loading...
FGNCX vs VCRCX
FGNCX vs VCRCX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs VCRCX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$12.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.78M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure
Price$13.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets894.45M
FGNCX vs VCRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. VCRCX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Buy and VCRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRCX has more cash in the bank: 894M vs. FGNCX (441M). FGNCX pays higher dividends than VCRCX: FGNCX (1.42) vs VCRCX (0.77). FGNCX was incepted earlier than VCRCX: FGNCX (16 years) vs VCRCX (6 years). VCRCX (2.10) and FGNCX (2.05) have similar cost to investors . FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. VCRCX (47.00). VCRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: VCRCX (1000) vs FGNCX (3000). VCRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.92 vs. FGNCX (14.96). VCRCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.54 vs. FGNCX (39.36).
| FGNCX | VCRCX | FGNCX / VCRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.08 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 2.10 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.672 | 6.520 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 894M | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.77 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 15.92 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.74 | 8.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.36 | 41.54 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers