Ad is loading...
FGNCX vs VCRQX
FGNCX vs VCRQX Comparison
Open Charts FGNCX vs VCRQX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$12.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.78M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6
Price$13.91
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets894.45M
FGNCX vs VCRQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGNCX vs. VCRQX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGNCX is a Buy and VCRQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRQX has more cash in the bank: 894M vs. FGNCX (441M). VCRQX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: VCRQX (1.89) vs FGNCX (1.42). FGNCX was incepted earlier than VCRQX: FGNCX (16 years) vs VCRQX (5 years). FGNCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than VCRQX (0.92). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. VCRQX (47.00). VCRQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: VCRQX (0) vs FGNCX (3000). VCRQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.27 vs. FGNCX (14.96). VCRQX return over 5 years is better than : 49.11 vs. FGNCX (39.36).
| FGNCX | VCRQX | FGNCX / VCRQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.92 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.92 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.672 | 6.865 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 894M | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.89 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 17.27 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.74 | 11.90 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.36 | 49.11 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...