Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGOMX vs RNWBX
FGOMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FGOMX vs RNWBX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Em Mkts
Price$13.95
Change-$0.15 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.59B
American Funds New World R2
Price$82.99
Change-$0.93 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.64B
FGOMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGOMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGOMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. FGOMX (27.6B). FGOMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FGOMX (2.13) vs RNWBX (0.13). FGOMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FGOMX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FGOMX (0.61). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FGOMX (33.00). FGOMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FGOMX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FGOMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.77 vs. RNWBX (11.17). FGOMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.63 vs. RNWBX (19.67).
| FGOMX | RNWBX | FGOMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.67 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.67 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.618 | 12.835 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.6B | 68.6B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.13 | 1,654% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.77 | 11.17 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.29 | 29.59 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.63 | 19.67 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement