Ad is loading...
FGSAX vs PAMCX
FGSAX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PAMCX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$49.46
Change-$0.87 (-1.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$98.99
Change-$1.34 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FGSAX vs. PAMCX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 29.8B vs. FGSAX (1.59B). FGSAX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FGSAX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: FGSAX (40 years) vs PAMCX (24 years). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. PAMCX (21.70). FGSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: FGSAX (1500) vs PAMCX (2500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.28 vs. PAMCX (5.80). FGSAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.37 vs. PAMCX (8.44).
| FGSAX | PAMCX | FGSAX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.374 | 5.599 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 29.8B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.28 | 5.80 | 384% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.08 | -20.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.37 | 8.44 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.47 | 30.71 | 11% |