Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs VMGMX
FGSCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs VMGMX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.59
Change+$0.35 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.05B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$120.50
Change+$0.92 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.66B
FGSCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and VMGMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. FGSCX (4.05B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: VMGMX (0.65) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: FGSCX (30 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). FGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: FGSCX (1500) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.19 vs. FGSCX (18.28). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 73.22 vs. FGSCX (7.46).
| FGSCX | VMGMX | FGSCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.07 | 2,786% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.07 | 2,829% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.010 | 9.466 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.05B | 29.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.28 | 21.19 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.27 | 52.36 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.46 | 73.22 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.78 | 166.30 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement