Ad is loading...
FGSCX vs VMGMX
FGSCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs VMGMX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$22.27
Change+$0.23 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$100.40
Change+$1.85 (+1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.18B
FGSCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. FGSCX (2.65B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: VMGMX (0.71) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: FGSCX (30 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VMGMX (14.00). FGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: FGSCX (1500) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.18 vs. FGSCX (-5.53). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 66.38 vs. FGSCX (3.77).
| FGSCX | VMGMX | FGSCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.07 | 2,786% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.07 | 2,829% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.609 | -9.785 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 27.2B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.53 | -1.18 | 468% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.16 | 7.68 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.77 | 66.38 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.70 | 113.56 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...