Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs PMBPX
FGSKX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs PMBPX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$58.23
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
FGSKX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.2B vs. FGSKX (4.11B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FGSKX (19 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). FGSKX (0) and PMBPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.33 vs. PMBPX (12.37). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 61.15 vs. FGSKX (54.44).
| FGSKX | PMBPX | FGSKX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.83 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.83 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.979 | 4.372 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.11B | 31.2B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.33 | 12.37 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.56 | 49.96 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.44 | 61.15 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.92 | 100.41 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement