Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSKX vs PMBPX
FGSKX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs PMBPX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$57.20
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
FGSKX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. FGSKX (3.91B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FGSKX (18 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). FGSKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). FGSKX (0) and PMBPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.64 vs. PMBPX (10.51). FGSKX (46.88) and PMBPX (46.06) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGSKX | PMBPX | FGSKX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.83 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.83 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.866 | 2.899 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 30.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.64 | 10.51 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.60 | 35.32 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.88 | 46.06 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.81 | 95.61 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers