Ad is loading...
FGSRX vs RGAFX
FGSRX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FGSRX vs RGAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$66.89
Change-$3.98 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
FGSRX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSRX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSRX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. FGSRX (16.5B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FGSRX: RGAFX (0.66) vs FGSRX (0.00). FGSRX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FGSRX (23 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FGSRX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FGSRX (7.35). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSRX: RGAFX (250) vs FGSRX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.51 vs. FGSRX (-5.41). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 73.14 vs. FGSRX (38.73).
| FGSRX | RGAFX | FGSRX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.34 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.34 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.702 | -4.770 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.5B | 280B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.66 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.41 | 0.51 | -1,054% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.01 | 5.94 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.73 | 73.14 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.24 | 62.64 | 101% |