Ad is loading...
FGZMX vs MEDAX
FGZMX vs MEDAX Comparison
Open Charts FGZMX vs MEDAX
Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income I
Price$12.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.49B
MFS Emerging Markets Debt A
Price$11.93
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7B
FGZMX vs MEDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGZMX vs. MEDAX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGZMX is a Hold and MEDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDAX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. FGZMX (4.49B). MEDAX pays higher dividends than FGZMX: MEDAX (6.53) vs FGZMX (4.79). FGZMX was incepted earlier than MEDAX: FGZMX (6 years) vs MEDAX (27 years). MEDAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGZMX (0.80). MEDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FGZMX (25.00). FGZMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEDAX: FGZMX (0) vs MEDAX (1000). FGZMX (6.79) and MEDAX (6.68) have marching annual gain over last year. FGZMX return over 5 years is better than : 21.09 vs. MEDAX (15.61).
| FGZMX | MEDAX | FGZMX / MEDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.399 | 1.592 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.49B | 7B | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.79 | 6.53 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.79 | 6.68 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.14 | 18.93 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.09 | 15.61 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...