Ad is loading...
FGZMX vs MEDCX
FGZMX vs MEDCX Comparison
Open Charts FGZMX vs MEDCX
Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income I
Price$12.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.49B
MFS Emerging Markets Debt C
Price$11.96
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7B
FGZMX vs MEDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGZMX vs. MEDCX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGZMX is a Hold and MEDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDCX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. FGZMX (4.49B). MEDCX pays higher dividends than FGZMX: MEDCX (5.77) vs FGZMX (4.79). FGZMX was incepted earlier than MEDCX: FGZMX (6 years) vs MEDCX (23 years). MEDCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FGZMX (0.80). MEDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FGZMX (25.00). FGZMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEDCX: FGZMX (0) vs MEDCX (1000). FGZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.79 vs. MEDCX (5.96). FGZMX return over 5 years is better than : 21.09 vs. MEDCX (11.37).
| FGZMX | MEDCX | FGZMX / MEDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.81 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.82 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.399 | 1.338 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.49B | 7B | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.79 | 5.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.79 | 5.96 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.14 | 16.37 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.09 | 11.37 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...