Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGZMX vs VEMBX
FGZMX vs VEMBX Comparison
Open Charts FGZMX vs VEMBX
Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income I
Price$12.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.49B
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Investor
Price$10.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.4B
FGZMX vs VEMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGZMX vs. VEMBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGZMX is a Hold and VEMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGZMX (4.49B) and VEMBX (4.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . VEMBX pays higher dividends than FGZMX: VEMBX (6.73) vs FGZMX (4.79). FGZMX was incepted earlier than VEMBX: FGZMX (6 years) vs VEMBX (9 years). FGZMX (0.80) is less costly to investors than VEMBX (0.50). VEMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. FGZMX (25.00). FGZMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEMBX: FGZMX (0) vs VEMBX (3000). VEMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. FGZMX (6.19). VEMBX return over 5 years is better than : 20.91 vs. FGZMX (17.14).
| FGZMX | VEMBX | FGZMX / VEMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.50 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.50 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.640 | 3.213 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.49B | 4.4B | 102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.79 | 6.73 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 7.43 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.84 | 27.39 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.14 | 20.91 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement