FHB
Price
$23.61
Change
+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.8B
49 days until earnings call
TRMK
Price
$34.68
Change
+$0.43 (+1.26%)
Updated
Jun 6, 12:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.72B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHB vs TRMK

Header iconFHB vs TRMK Comparison
Open Charts FHB vs TRMKBanner chart's image
First Hawaiian
Price$23.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$696.76K
Capitalization2.8B
Trustmark
Price$34.68
Change+$0.43 (+1.26%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.72B
FHB vs TRMK Comparison Chart
Loading...
FHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRMK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHB vs. TRMK commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHB is a Hold and TRMK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FHB: $23.61 vs. TRMK: $34.25)
Brand notoriety: FHB and TRMK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHB: 84% vs. TRMK: 73%
Market capitalization -- FHB: $2.8B vs. TRMK: $1.72B
FHB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.8B. TRMK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRMK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRMK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the long-term than TRMK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRMK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRMK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the short-term than TRMK.

Price Growth

FHB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while TRMK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHB is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

TRMK is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHB($2.8B) has a higher market cap than TRMK($1.72B). FHB has higher P/E ratio than TRMK: FHB (11.69) vs TRMK (10.19). TRMK YTD gains are higher at: -1.846 vs. FHB (-7.161). FHB has less debt than TRMK: FHB (500M) vs TRMK (631M). FHB has higher revenues than TRMK: FHB (805M) vs TRMK (658M).
FHBTRMKFHB / TRMK
Capitalization2.8B1.72B163%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.161-1.846388%
P/E Ratio11.6910.19115%
Revenue805M658M122%
Total Cash246MN/A-
Total Debt500M631M79%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHB vs TRMK: Fundamental Ratings
FHB
TRMK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4446
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
374
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHB's Valuation (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (79). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (46). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (9). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (56). This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHB (37). This means that TRMK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHBTRMK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRMK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRFGX25.05N/A
N/A
BlackRock Capital Appreciation R
FACSX49.23N/A
N/A
Nuveen Mid Cap Value 1 C
LMCYX32.24N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock I
CLSUX25.84N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders A
DOXGX263.480.01
N/A
Dodge & Cox Stock X

FHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHB
1D Price
Change %
FHB100%
+0.08%
UBSI - FHB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
FFBC - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
AUB - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
CATY - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
TRMK - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
More