Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHCIX vs PRHSX
FHCIX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHCIX vs. PRHSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHCIX is a Hold and PRHSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FHCIX (3.35B). PRHSX pays higher dividends than FHCIX: PRHSX (0.01) vs FHCIX (0.00). FHCIX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FHCIX (29 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). PRHSX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FHCIX (0.69). PRHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.40 vs. FHCIX (37.00). FHCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FHCIX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). FHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.60 vs. PRHSX (-21.07). FHCIX return over 5 years is better than : -11.22 vs. PRHSX (-15.51).
| FHCIX | PRHSX | FHCIX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.80 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.80 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.885 | -2.414 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 11.2B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.60 | -21.07 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.55 | -10.20 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.22 | -15.51 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.27 | -8.36 | -290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement