Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHJFX vs RBKTX
FHJFX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHJFX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHJFX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. FHJFX (3.75B). FHJFX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FHJFX (1.57) vs RBKTX (0.55). FHJFX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FHJFX (7 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FHJFX (0.47). FHJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FHJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FHJFX (0) vs RBKTX (250). FHJFX (8.69) and RBKTX (8.35) have marching annual gain over last year. FHJFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.09 vs. RBKTX (39.01).
| FHJFX | RBKTX | FHJFX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.45 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.45 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.816 | 5.998 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 46.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.55 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.69 | 8.35 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.59 | 30.05 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.09 | 39.01 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers