Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHJFX vs RHGTX
FHJFX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHJFX vs. RHGTX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHJFX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.9B vs. FHJFX (4.02B). FHJFX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FHJFX (1.50) vs RHGTX (1.33). FHJFX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FHJFX (7 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FHJFX (0.47). FHJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). FHJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: FHJFX (0) vs RHGTX (250). RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. FHJFX (8.11). FHJFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.52 vs. RHGTX (42.73).
| FHJFX | RHGTX | FHJFX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.50 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.50 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.289 | 10.718 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.02B | 47.9B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.33 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 10.36 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.67 | 40.58 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.52 | 42.73 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement