Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCHFX
FHKAX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$42.55
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Matthews China Investor
Price$14.46
Change-$0.13 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets359.39M
FHKAX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCHFX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MCHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. MCHFX (359M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCHFX (1.82) vs FHKAX (1.16). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MCHFX (27 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKAX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.75 vs. FHKAX (15.50). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.78 vs. MCHFX (-28.50).
| FHKAX | MCHFX | FHKAX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.25 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.25 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.923 | 8.557 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 359M | 320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.82 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.50 | 22.75 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.74 | -9.62 | -288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.78 | -28.50 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.75 | -37.06 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement