Ad is loading...
FHKCX vs HLMCX
FHKCX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs HLMCX
Fidelity China Region
Price$41.41
Change-$1.39 (-3.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.75
Change-$0.12 (-2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.07M
FHKCX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. HLMCX (3.07M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: FHKCX (1.31) vs HLMCX (1.08). FHKCX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKCX (29 years) vs HLMCX (4 years). HLMCX (3.81) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKCX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKCX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.28 vs. HLMCX (20.92).
| FHKCX | HLMCX | FHKCX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.81 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.054 | 10.755 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 3.07M | 38,050% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.08 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.28 | 20.92 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.99 | -13.57 | -206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.60 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.19 | N/A | - |