Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs HLMCX
FHKCX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs HLMCX
Fidelity China Region
Price$44.96
Change+$0.11 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99M
FHKCX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. HLMCX (2.99M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: FHKCX (1.22) vs HLMCX (1.07). FHKCX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKCX (30 years) vs HLMCX (5 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKCX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKCX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.55 vs. HLMCX (17.39).
| FHKCX | HLMCX | FHKCX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 4.12 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.608 | 7.736 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 2.99M | 41,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.07 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.55 | 17.39 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.29 | -21.69 | -144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.62 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement