Ad is loading...
FHKCX vs HLMCX
FHKCX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs HLMCX
Fidelity China Region
Price$37.10
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67M
FHKCX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. HLMCX (2.67M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: FHKCX (1.33) vs HLMCX (1.08). FHKCX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKCX (29 years) vs HLMCX (4 years). HLMCX (3.81) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKCX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKCX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.69 vs. HLMCX (5.70).
| FHKCX | HLMCX | FHKCX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.81 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.066 | -3.774 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 2.67M | 44,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.08 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.69 | 5.70 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.39 | -23.58 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.86 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers