Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs HLMCX
FHKCX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs HLMCX
Fidelity China Region
Price$42.62
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.97M
FHKCX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. HLMCX (2.97M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: FHKCX (1.32) vs HLMCX (1.08). FHKCX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKCX (30 years) vs HLMCX (4 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKCX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKCX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.59 vs. HLMCX (8.81).
| FHKCX | HLMCX | FHKCX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 4.12 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.437 | 7.170 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 2.97M | 38,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.08 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.59 | 8.81 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.14 | -17.91 | -129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.93 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement