Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs TCELX
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs TCELX
Fidelity China Region
Price$46.53
Change+$0.27 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$12.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.21M
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. TCELX (51.2M). TCELX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: TCELX (1.29) vs FHKCX (1.22). FHKCX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKCX (30 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKCX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.24 vs. TCELX (21.24). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.76 vs. TCELX (-4.74).
| FHKCX | TCELX | FHKCX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.67 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.645 | 15.163 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 51.2M | 2,414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.24 | 21.24 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.39 | -0.98 | -3,925% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.76 | -4.74 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement