Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs TCELX
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs TCELX
Fidelity China Region
Price$43.19
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$11.52
Change-$0.16 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.4M
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. TCELX (45.4M). TCELX (1.36) and FHKCX (1.32) have matching dividends . FHKCX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKCX (30 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKCX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.78 vs. TCELX (8.22). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. TCELX (-3.95).
| FHKCX | TCELX | FHKCX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.67 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.057 | 8.651 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 45.4M | 2,531% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.36 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.78 | 8.22 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.86 | -6.93 | -416% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.45 | -3.95 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement