Ad is loading...
FHKIX vs HSHAX
FHKIX vs HSHAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs HSHAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$40.53
Change+$0.11 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Hartford Schroders China A A
Price$10.31
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.68M
FHKIX vs HSHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. HSHAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and HSHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. HSHAX (16.7M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than HSHAX: FHKIX (1.44) vs HSHAX (0.39). FHKIX was incepted earlier than HSHAX: FHKIX (17 years) vs HSHAX (5 years). HSHAX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). HSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHAX: FHKIX (0) vs HSHAX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.92 vs. HSHAX (5.07). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.19 vs. HSHAX (-6.84).
| FHKIX | HSHAX | FHKIX / HSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.45 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.10 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.054 | 1.576 | 321% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 16.7M | 6,569% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.39 | 372% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.92 | 5.07 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.74 | -10.63 | -317% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.19 | -6.84 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...