Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs HSHAX
FHKIX vs HSHAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs HSHAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$44.60
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Hartford Schroders China A A
Price$10.75
Change+$0.08 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
FHKIX vs HSHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. HSHAX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and HSHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. HSHAX (17.3M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than HSHAX: FHKIX (1.27) vs HSHAX (0.37). FHKIX was incepted earlier than HSHAX: FHKIX (17 years) vs HSHAX (5 years). HSHAX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). HSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHAX: FHKIX (0) vs HSHAX (2000). HSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.46 vs. FHKIX (19.56). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.51 vs. HSHAX (-14.85).
| FHKIX | HSHAX | FHKIX / HSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.45 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.10 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.604 | 5.911 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 17.3M | 7,145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.37 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.56 | 24.46 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.31 | -20.21 | -155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.51 | -14.85 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement