Ad is loading...
FHKIX vs HSHFX
FHKIX vs HSHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs HSHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$40.53
Change+$0.11 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Hartford Schroders China A F
Price$10.34
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.68M
FHKIX vs HSHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. HSHFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and HSHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. HSHFX (16.7M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than HSHFX: FHKIX (1.44) vs HSHFX (0.86). FHKIX was incepted earlier than HSHFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs HSHFX (5 years). HSHFX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). HSHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHFX: FHKIX (0) vs HSHFX (1000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.92 vs. HSHFX (5.54). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.19 vs. HSHFX (-4.97).
| FHKIX | HSHFX | FHKIX / HSHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.99 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.67 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.054 | 1.772 | 285% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 16.7M | 6,569% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.86 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.92 | 5.54 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.74 | -9.51 | -355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.19 | -4.97 | -185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers