Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs HSHFX
FHKIX vs HSHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs HSHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$44.60
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Hartford Schroders China A F
Price$10.79
Change+$0.08 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.17M
FHKIX vs HSHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. HSHFX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and HSHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. HSHFX (17.2M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than HSHFX: FHKIX (1.27) vs HSHFX (0.81). FHKIX was incepted earlier than HSHFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs HSHFX (5 years). HSHFX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). HSHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHFX: FHKIX (0) vs HSHFX (1000000). HSHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.14 vs. FHKIX (19.29). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.27 vs. HSHFX (-13.70).
| FHKIX | HSHFX | FHKIX / HSHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.99 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.67 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.345 | 5.413 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 17.2M | 7,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.81 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.29 | 24.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.02 | -19.75 | -157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.27 | -13.70 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement