Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MMCFX
FHKIX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MMCFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$44.15
Change+$0.20 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
AMG Veritas China N
Price$15.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.66M
FHKIX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MMCFX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. MMCFX (41.7M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than MMCFX: FHKIX (1.27) vs MMCFX (1.19). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKIX (0) vs MMCFX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.72 vs. MMCFX (14.91). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.00 vs. MMCFX (-55.71).
| FHKIX | MMCFX | FHKIX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.14 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.48 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.919 | 12.657 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 41.7M | 2,964% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.19 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.72 | 14.91 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.40 | -21.88 | -134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.00 | -55.71 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.95 | -65.91 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement