Ad is loading...
FHKIX vs WCQGX
FHKIX vs WCQGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs WCQGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$37.00
Change+$1.50 (+4.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
WCM China Quality Growth Investor
Price$8.53
Change+$0.22 (+2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61M
FHKIX vs WCQGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. WCQGX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and WCQGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. WCQGX (1.61M). WCQGX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: WCQGX (1.82) vs FHKIX (1.38). FHKIX was incepted earlier than WCQGX: FHKIX (17 years) vs WCQGX (5 years). WCQGX (5.46) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). WCQGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCQGX: FHKIX (0) vs WCQGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. WCQGX (2.28). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.28 vs. WCQGX (-16.82).
| FHKIX | WCQGX | FHKIX / WCQGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.50 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 5.46 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.983 | -3.596 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 1.61M | 73,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.82 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.81 | 2.28 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.14 | -26.34 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.28 | -16.82 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...