Ad is loading...
FHKTX vs MMCFX
FHKTX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MMCFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$37.76
Change-$0.15 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
AMG Veritas China N
Price$14.38
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.96M
FHKTX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MMCFX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. MMCFX (41M). MMCFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MMCFX (1.19) vs FHKTX (1.06). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MMCFX (1.33). MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKTX (0) vs MMCFX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.67 vs. MMCFX (5.87). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 0.28 vs. MMCFX (-54.80).
| FHKTX | MMCFX | FHKTX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.14 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.33 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.368 | 6.884 | -5% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 41M | 2,866% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.67 | 5.87 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.22 | -13.76 | -118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.28 | -54.80 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.51 | -66.93 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers