Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MMCFX
FHKTX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MMCFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$43.23
Change-$0.39 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
AMG Veritas China N
Price$15.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.73M
FHKTX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MMCFX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. MMCFX (41.7M). MMCFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MMCFX (1.23) vs FHKTX (1.05). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) and FHKTX (1.43) have similar cost to investors . MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKTX (0) vs MMCFX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.13 vs. MMCFX (15.07). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 2.30 vs. MMCFX (-55.48).
| FHKTX | MMCFX | FHKTX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.14 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.48 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.639 | 12.805 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 41.7M | 2,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.23 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.13 | 15.07 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.39 | -21.78 | -130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.30 | -55.48 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.28 | -65.87 | -41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement