Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs WCQGX
FHKTX vs WCQGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs WCQGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$47.15
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
WCM China Quality Growth Investor
Price$10.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92M
FHKTX vs WCQGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. WCQGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and WCQGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. WCQGX (1.92M). WCQGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: WCQGX (1.72) vs FHKTX (0.93). FHKTX was incepted earlier than WCQGX: FHKTX (17 years) vs WCQGX (5 years). WCQGX (13.45) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). WCQGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCQGX: FHKTX (0) vs WCQGX (1000). WCQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. FHKTX (32.13). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 1.15 vs. WCQGX (-23.34).
| FHKTX | WCQGX | FHKTX / WCQGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.63 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 13.45 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.916 | 20.534 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 1.92M | 67,969% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.72 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.13 | 35.91 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.38 | -5.13 | -904% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.15 | -23.34 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement