Ad is loading...
FHTFX vs NHCCX
FHTFX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FHTFX vs NHCCX
Federated Hermes Municipal HY Adv F
Price$7.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.9M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.14
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
FHTFX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHTFX vs. NHCCX commentary
May 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHTFX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. FHTFX (454M). NHCCX pays higher dividends than FHTFX: NHCCX (4.49) vs FHTFX (4.01). FHTFX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: FHTFX (38 years) vs NHCCX (11 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than FHTFX (1.07). NHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FHTFX (20.00). FHTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: FHTFX (1500) vs NHCCX (3000). FHTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.64 vs. NHCCX (0.69). FHTFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.79 vs. NHCCX (11.19).
| FHTFX | NHCCX | FHTFX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.91 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.91 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.695 | -2.516 | 67% |
| Front Load | 1% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 14.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.01 | 4.49 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.64 | 0.69 | 384% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.25 | 1.25 | 500% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.79 | 11.19 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.02 | 13.26 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers