Ad is loading...
FHXEX vs RCITX
FHXEX vs RCITX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHXEX vs. RCITX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHXEX is a Hold and RCITX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCITX has more cash in the bank: 34.7B vs. FHXEX (2.78B). FHXEX pays higher dividends than RCITX: FHXEX (1.00) vs RCITX (0.72). FHXEX was incepted earlier than RCITX: FHXEX (7 years) vs RCITX (18 years). FHXEX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RCITX (1.01). FHXEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RCITX (5.00). FHXEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCITX: FHXEX (0) vs RCITX (250). RCITX (9.08) and FHXEX (8.87) have marching annual gain over last year. FHXEX (49.90) and RCITX (48.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FHXEX | RCITX | FHXEX / RCITX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.01 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.01 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.051 | 1.272 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 34.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | 9.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.01 | 18.91 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.90 | 48.34 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers