Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHZEX vs RHGTX
FHZEX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHZEX vs. RHGTX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHZEX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.6B vs. FHZEX (3.75B). RHGTX pays higher dividends than FHZEX: RHGTX (1.39) vs FHZEX (0.95). FHZEX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FHZEX (7 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). FHZEX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RHGTX (0.50). FHZEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). FHZEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: FHZEX (0) vs RHGTX (250). RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.05 vs. FHZEX (8.01). RHGTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.81 vs. FHZEX (41.95).
| FHZEX | RHGTX | FHZEX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.50 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.50 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.624 | 6.785 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 46.6B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.01 | 10.05 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.55 | 37.49 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | 45.81 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement