FI
Price
$135.30
Change
-$3.64 (-2.62%)
Updated
Aug 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.56B
88 days until earnings call
PYPL
Price
$67.10
Change
-$1.66 (-2.41%)
Updated
Aug 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
71.8B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FI vs PYPL

Header iconFI vs PYPL Comparison
Open Charts FI vs PYPLBanner chart's image
Fiserv
Price$135.30
Change-$3.64 (-2.62%)
Volume$20.89K
Capitalization73.56B
PayPal Holdings
Price$67.10
Change-$1.66 (-2.41%)
Volume$190.89K
Capitalization71.8B
FI vs PYPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FI vs. PYPL commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FI is a Hold and PYPL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FI: $138.94 vs. PYPL: $68.76)
Brand notoriety: FI: Not notable vs. PYPL: Notable
FI represents the Information Technology Services, while PYPL is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FI: 102% vs. PYPL: 154%
Market capitalization -- FI: $73.56B vs. PYPL: $71.8B
FI [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $73.56B. PYPL’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $71.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $232.93B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.78B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePYPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PYPL is a better buy in the long-term than FI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYPL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PYPL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FI is a better buy in the short-term than PYPL.

Price Growth

FI (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while PYPL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -11.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -4.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +93.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.10%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FI is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-4.77% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.32% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FI($73.6B) and PYPL($71.8B) have the same market capitalization . FI has higher P/E ratio than PYPL: FI (22.63) vs PYPL (16.93). PYPL YTD gains are higher at: -19.438 vs. FI (-32.363). FI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.03B vs. PYPL (6.83B). PYPL has more cash in the bank: 14.1B vs. FI (641M). PYPL has less debt than FI: PYPL (9.68B) vs FI (28.4B). PYPL has higher revenues than FI: PYPL (29.8B) vs FI (20.7B).
FIPYPLFI / PYPL
Capitalization73.6B71.8B103%
EBITDA9.03B6.83B132%
Gain YTD-32.363-19.438166%
P/E Ratio22.6316.93134%
Revenue20.7B29.8B69%
Total Cash641M14.1B5%
Total Debt28.4B9.68B294%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FI vs PYPL: Fundamental Ratings
FI
PYPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5810
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
6141
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7459
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FI's Valuation (56) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (90) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

FI's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FI’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

PYPL's SMR Rating (41) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FI (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to FI’s over the last 12 months.

PYPL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FI (65) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to FI’s over the last 12 months.

PYPL's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FI (74) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to FI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIPYPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGRO37.480.11
+0.29%
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
ULST40.620.01
+0.02%
SPDR® SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
CRPT23.45-0.10
-0.42%
First Trust SkyBdg Cry Idt & Dgt Eco ETF
IOO111.63-0.60
-0.53%
iShares Global 100 ETF
NTSE33.38-0.25
-0.74%
WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Effcnt Cr ETF

FI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FI has been loosely correlated with ASGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FI jumps, then ASGN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FI
1D Price
Change %
FI100%
-1.36%
ASGN - FI
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
IBM - FI
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
DXC - FI
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
BR - FI
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
TTGT - FI
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
More